H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Mark Cox H2H: 3-1
Thomaz Koch holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Koch leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomaz Koch won the 1976 Buenos Aires fourth round 3-6 6-4 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1976* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomaz Koch | 3-6 6-4 8-6 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1974* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Thomaz Koch | 7-6 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1969* | Caracas | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Thomaz Koch | 8-6 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1968* | Durban 1 | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-0 11-9 6-3 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |