H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-1
Thomaz Koch and Ricardo Cano are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1981 Guaruja third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1981* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ricardo Cano | 6-4 6-3 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1976* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Thomaz Koch | 6-4 6-4 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |