H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-3
Rod Laver holds a 3–0 lead over Thomaz Koch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1975 Sao Paulo Wct semifinal 6-1 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1975* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1968* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Rod Laver | 6-2 8-6 6-2 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Rod Laver | 6-8 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |