H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-2
Roscoe Tanner holds a 2–1 lead over Thomaz Koch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomaz Koch won the 1975 Denver Wct fourth round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1975* | Denver Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Thomaz Koch | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1975* | Orlando Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 6-2 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1973 | Caracas | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | UNK | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |