H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ti Chen vs Leos Friedl

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ti Chen vs Leos Friedl.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ti Chen
TPE Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Leos Friedl
CZE Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ti Chen #321 5-7 6-1 6-2 Leos Friedl Match data Sep 25, 2007* Q3 Q Mumbai International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ti Chen #1,433 #184 270 1,526 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leos Friedl #1,507 #353 83 1,550 3 5 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ti Chen Leos Friedl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2005 0–1 0.0% #332 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #316 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #486 1,516 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #532 1,498 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2006 2–1 66.7% #540 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ti Chen Leos Friedl
Yr HardClayCarpet Yr HardClayCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ti Chen Leos Friedl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2005 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.6% 54.3% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 52.7% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 50.0% 31.6% 28.6% 0.0% 42.9% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.2% 64.1% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 28.3% 2000 3/3 0.7 2.7 60.9% 62.6% 53.0% 27.8% 28.7% 58.8% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 2/2 6.5 5.0 62.5% 71.0% 45.6% 52.7% 7.1% 61.6% 33.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 4.3 3.7 66.2% 63.8% 45.7% 45.2% 57.6% 57.6% 45.5%
Career — 3/3 1.3 1.3 65.7% 56.1% 40.5% 29.0% 33.3% 51.0% 30.1% — 8/8 3.5 3.6 63.3% 65.2% 48.4% 40.5% 34.2% 59.1% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ti Chen Leos Friedl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2005 1455 95.8 -1.39 -0.30 0.731 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1436 92.0 -1.13 -2.15 0.481 36.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1482 107.1 +2.38 +1.68 0.664 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.19 2000 1516 106.0 -0.14 +0.06 0.983 49.2% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.03
24 2008 1465 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1499 105.9 +0.61 +0.12 0.858 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 2–0 — -0.08
26 2010 1450 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1463 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1439 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1420 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1520 106.3 -0.60 +0.67 1.072 51.4% — +40 — 62.5% +0.88 1–1 1–1 — +0.39
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1531 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1389 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1514 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1365 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1494 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1384 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1480 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1495 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1527 96.7 -0.05 -0.26 0.615 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.67 — 1551 109.0 -0.13 +0.30 0.988 49.3% +18 +40 — 45.5% -0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 +3.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.