H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 1-1
Tim Henman and Agustin Calleri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2003 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2003* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agustin Calleri | 6-4 7-6(4) | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Agustin Calleri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |