H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Albert Costa H2H: 7-2

Tim Henman holds a 7–2 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 5–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Madrid Masters third round 6-4 6-2.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #5 6-4 6-2 Albert Costa #54 Match data
Aug 2, 2001* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Albert Costa #44 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 Tim Henman #8 Match data
May 9, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #10 6-2 3-6 6-1 Albert Costa #38 Match data
Apr 21, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tim Henman #12 2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 Albert Costa #36 Match data
Mar 8, 2001* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-1 6-2 Albert Costa #31 Match data
Nov 16, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Albert Costa #32 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Nov 2, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-2 6-3 Albert Costa #31 Match data
Mar 11, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-3 Albert Costa #16 Match data
Aug 8, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #12 7-6(2) 6-2 Albert Costa #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11