H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 2-0
Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Zagreb quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| May 12, 2004* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tim Henman | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |