H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 1-2
Andrei Medvedev holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 2000 Estoril quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2000* | Estoril | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-2 6-3 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1999* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1997* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 6-3 6-3 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Andrei Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |