H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-2

Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1996 Queen's Club Championships round of 32 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Andrei Olhovskiy
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Olhovskiy #110 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 Tim Henman #61 Match data Jun 13, 1996* R32 Queen's Club Championships World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Andrei Olhovskiy #130 4-6 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #84 Match data Feb 3, 1996* SF Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Andrei Olhovskiy #1,310 #49 690 1,731 116 163 41.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Andrei Olhovskiy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% #232 1,470 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1988 6–8 42.9% #86 1,519 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1989 4–10 28.6% #302 1,509 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1990 4–4 50.0% #148 1,567 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1991 4–10 28.6% #136 1,513 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1992 16–18 47.1% #80 1,639 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1993 26–29 47.3% #65 1,662 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1994 23–27 46.0% #97 1,671 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 1995 12–21 36.4% #118 1,586 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 1996 21–19 52.5% #90 1,695 0 2
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 1997 0–14 0.0% #442 1,492 0 2
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,481 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1992 5 7 12 41.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 5 18 72.2%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1994 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 30 61 91 33.0% 16 36 52 30.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 47 43 90 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 209/241 of Andrei Olhovskiy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1991 11/14 4.6 4.6 54.5% 68.7% 43.3% 45.8% 38.1% 57.2% 34.9%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1992 34/34 5.6 4.1 54.4% 74.1% 50.1% 54.5% 38.5% 63.1% 37.8%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1993 45/55 6.8 3.3 57.9% 74.4% 48.4% 56.1% 34.0% 63.4% 37.0%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1994 46/50 9.6 5.1 55.7% 75.3% 48.5% 53.6% 44.2% 63.5% 35.8%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 1995 30/33 8.2 3.7 56.8% 73.7% 48.4% 57.7% 29.0% 62.8% 35.3%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 1996 30/40 8.3 4.8 56.3% 75.4% 47.6% 63.7% 38.3% 63.3% 34.4%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 1997 12/14 10.7 5.5 52.7% 70.8% 45.8% 60.2% 31.0% 59.0% 32.3%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.8% 62.5% 57.9% 0.0% 100.0% 61.0% 34.2%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 209/279 7.7 4.3 56.0% 74.0% 48.2% 56.0% 37.2% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1987 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.07
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1988 1519 108.6 — — — — -34 — +107 45.7% -0.66 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +1.54
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1989 1509 111.6 — — — — -2 -18 — 33.3% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.23
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1990 1568 127.2 — — — — +6 — — 55.0% +0.45 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.41
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1991 1513 111.9 -2.55 -1.87 0.815 46.2% -30 — +200 32.5% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1992 1639 134.2 +1.24 +0.43 1.025 50.2% -51 -113 +131 49.4% -0.09 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) — -0.10
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1993 1662 134.3 +1.97 -1.09 1.010 49.5% +17 -124 +94 48.1% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.58
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1994 1672 128.7 +1.65 -1.73 0.981 49.6% +4 -106 +40 47.0% -0.23 11–12 (48%) 7–16 (30%) — +1.82
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 1995 1587 124.1 +0.08 -2.77 0.951 49.1% +39 -62 +77 41.3% -0.43 2–3 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.70
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 1996 1696 125.1 +0.74 -2.13 0.940 49.1% -13 -175 -15 50.5% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) — +1.43
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 1997 1493 110.3 -2.20 -3.61 0.788 45.9% +37 — — 19.4% -1.58 0–7 (0%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.18
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 1998 1482 100.8 -0.17 -0.96 0.878 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1732 130.9 +0.85 -1.56 0.961 49.1% +1 -104 +85 44.1% -0.36 44–57 (44%) 57–74 (44%) 98.2 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.