H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Boris Becker H2H: 0-2
Boris Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1998 Dubai third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1998* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Boris Becker | 7-5 6-0 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Dec 8, 1996* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | SF | Carpet | Boris Becker | 7-6 6-3 6-1 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Boris Becker | #257 | #1 | 4,297 | 2,266 | 670 | 219 | 75.4% | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Boris Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #6 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 65–13 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,229 | 2 | 9 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,040 | 2 | 12 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 50–9 | 84.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 2 | 19 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 54–8 | 87.1% | #2 | 2,232 | 4 | 24 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 69–14 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,206 | 4 | 29 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,112 | 5 | 31 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,145 | 5 | 36 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,885 | 5 | 38 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #3 | 2,052 | 5 | 42 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,043 | 5 | 44 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,083 | 6 | 49 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #62 | 1,914 | 6 | 49 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #69 | 1,874 | 6 | 49 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #131 | 1,863 | 6 | 49 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |