H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-2

Tim Henman holds a 4–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Basel third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2002* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-4 Cedric Pioline #120 Match data
Mar 15, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-3 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data
Feb 20, 2000* Rotterdam ATP 250 F Hard Cedric Pioline #15 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(4) Tim Henman #11 Match data
Jul 2, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Tim Henman #6 6-4 6-2 4-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #39 Match data
Mar 16, 1996* Copenhagen ATP 250 SF Carpet Cedric Pioline #32 6-3 3-6 6-1 Tim Henman #64 Match data
Aug 14, 1995 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Tim Henman #150 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5