H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 3-2

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Brighton quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #10 (w/o) Chris Woodruff #72 Match data Nov 25, 2000* QF Brighton ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Chris Woodruff #56 7-5 1-6 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tim Henman #13 Match data Jan 26, 2000* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #6 6-4 6-3 7-6(4) Chris Woodruff #126 Match data Jun 25, 1999* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Woodruff #550 6-1 1-6 7-5 Tim Henman #7 Match data Mar 14, 1999* QF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #37 (w/o) Chris Woodruff #45 Match data Aug 22, 1996* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,838 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Chris Woodruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,497 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,481 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,677 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,803 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,787 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,773 0 2
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,695 0 2
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,633 0 2
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,593 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Chris Woodruff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1997 22 11 33 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 14 15 29 48.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2001 10 12 22 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 67 65 132 50.8% 19 22 41 46.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 179/214 of Chris Woodruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Chris Woodruff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1993 1/3 4.0 4.0 56.3% 71.1% 62.9% 71.4% 33.3% 67.5% 30.0%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.3% 57.1% 37.5% 52.3% 33.3% 50.9% 34.8%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1995 2/3 1.0 6.0 53.3% 61.4% 47.2% 42.8% 53.3% 54.8% 39.7%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1996 32/38 6.5 4.0 59.8% 72.0% 48.0% 61.6% 40.1% 62.3% 40.1%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1997 49/56 6.0 4.2 57.9% 74.0% 50.3% 54.5% 36.3% 64.0% 38.6%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1998 1/1 8.0 2.0 60.9% 64.3% 48.1% 57.1% 25.0% 58.0% 35.3%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1999 38/41 5.9 4.2 60.8% 73.5% 49.5% 58.5% 38.8% 64.0% 37.6%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2000 34/41 6.5 4.2 59.3% 72.4% 49.5% 52.9% 46.7% 63.0% 36.6%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2001 19/28 4.8 3.8 65.8% 67.7% 45.9% 58.6% 52.2% 60.2% 35.1%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2002 1/1 4.0 5.0 66.4% 70.7% 39.5% 70.0% 20.0% 60.2% 32.7%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 179/214 6.0 4.1 60.1% 72.1% 48.9% 56.8% 41.2% 62.8% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Chris Woodruff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1993 1497 110.8 +0.56 +4.55 0.923 48.8% +35 — — 40.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.06
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1994 1481 96.1 -2.29 +1.41 0.709 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1995 1486 109.6 +0.15 -0.21 0.879 47.1% +32 — — 28.6% -0.57 — 0–1 — -0.05
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1996 1678 138.2 +1.11 +1.61 1.063 51.3% -22 -65 -97 54.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.13
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1997 1804 146.3 +1.26 +1.60 1.073 51.1% +26 -96 -221 58.0% +0.54 13–6 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.17
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1998 1787 106.1 +1.63 -0.13 0.840 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1999 1774 139.1 +1.52 +0.86 1.046 50.9% +3 -96 -95 52.4% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.19
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2000 1695 134.9 +1.03 +0.26 0.990 49.9% +38 -67 -63 45.8% -0.07 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.59
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2001 1634 127.7 -1.74 -0.84 0.882 48.5% +56 -83 -24 40.8% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2002 1593 96.1 -5.60 +0.39 0.822 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.14
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1838 142.0 +0.83 +0.91 1.016 50.4% +21 -81 -99 50.0% +0.15 39–34 (53%) 34–49 (41%) 97.5 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.