H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 3-2

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Brighton quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 25, 2000* Brighton ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #10 (w/o) Chris Woodruff #72 Match data
Jan 26, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Chris Woodruff #56 7-5 1-6 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tim Henman #13 Match data
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tim Henman #6 6-4 6-3 7-6(4) Chris Woodruff #126 Match data
Mar 14, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Chris Woodruff #550 6-1 1-6 7-5 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Aug 22, 1996* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #37 (w/o) Chris Woodruff #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,829 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Chris Woodruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,496 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,480 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,667 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,777 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,761 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,770 0 2
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,687 0 2
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,630 0 2
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,589 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 — — — — — — —