H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Christian Vinck H2H: 1-0
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Christian Vinck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-4 7-6(3) | Christian Vinck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Christian Vinck | #1,558 | #101 | 453 | 1,646 | 17 | 48 | 26.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Christian Vinck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #102 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #172 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #409 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |