H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Donald Young H2H: 1-0
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-1 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |