H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 6-2

Tim Henman holds a 6–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Rotterdam fourth round 7-5 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #11 7-5 4-6 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #27 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #12 6-3 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #42 Match data
Mar 21, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #52 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Oct 13, 2000* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #35 Match data
Aug 13, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tim Henman #16 6-1 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #37 Match data
May 11, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #28 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Feb 18, 2000* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-2 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #35 Match data
May 13, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #17 6-1 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6