H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Felix Mantilla H2H: 3-1
Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Felix Mantilla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Miami Masters third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-5 6-4 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2001* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 7-5 6-1 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1997* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Felix Mantilla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 |