H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-1

Tim Henman and Fernando Verdasco are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Madrid Masters second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #41 7-5 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #26 Match data
Aug 31, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #48 6-4 6-2 6-2 Tim Henman #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7