H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 3-1

Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Canada Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #4 6-4 6-4 Fernando Vicente #50 Match data
Oct 14, 2000* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #10 6-4 7-6(3) Fernando Vicente #42 Match data
Aug 30, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-3 6-4 Fernando Vicente #44 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Vicente #31 7-5 4-6 6-4 4-6 6-3 Tim Henman #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 158 212 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Fernando Vicente
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,570 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,655 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,638 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2000 23–31 42.6% #47 1,615 0 2
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,637 0 3
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,600 0 3
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,593 0 3
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,508 0 3
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,484 0 3
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,489 0 3