H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Galo Blanco H2H: 2-1

Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Roland Garros round of 32 7-6(3) 6-1 6-2.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #9 7-6(3) 6-1 6-2 Galo Blanco #95 Match data May 30, 2004* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tim Henman #6 6-4 6-3 7-6(6) Galo Blanco #89 Match data May 29, 2002* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Galo Blanco #59 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #15 Match data Apr 22, 1998* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Galo Blanco #809 #40 963 1,751 122 175 41.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Galo Blanco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 0–1 0.0% #470 1,489 0 0
18 1995 3–4 42.9% #164 1,520 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1996 11–16 40.7% #97 1,542 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1997 16–20 44.4% #52 1,594 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1998 20–25 44.4% #82 1,623 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1999 14–19 42.4% #75 1,622 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2000 12–20 37.5% #114 1,571 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2001 20–23 46.5% #56 1,632 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2002 8–19 29.6% #134 1,573 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2003 10–9 52.6% #99 1,625 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2004 7–15 31.8% #174 1,556 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2005 0–3 0.0% #315 1,499 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2006 1–1 50.0% #822 1,510 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Galo Blanco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1995 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 11 14 25 44.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 17 18 35 48.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 3 6 9 33.3% 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 0 6 6 0.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2003 10 9 19 52.6%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2005 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
Career 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% 10 39 49 20.4% 111 126 237 46.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 256/297 of Galo Blanco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Galo Blanco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 1994 1/1 5.0 6.0 60.0% 68.3% 47.6% 54.5% 60.0% 60.0% 39.3%
18 —/— 1995 5/7 1.4 1.4 64.6% 57.5% 50.3% 52.1% 37.7% 54.7% 39.6%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 1996 21/27 3.2 3.1 63.2% 64.8% 45.5% 51.5% 43.3% 57.8% 36.0%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1997 30/36 4.0 3.5 57.0% 66.2% 48.9% 61.4% 48.8% 58.6% 35.1%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1998 37/45 4.1 2.5 55.0% 67.3% 49.0% 58.3% 33.2% 59.1% 37.7%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1999 28/33 5.0 3.3 52.3% 71.8% 51.6% 53.7% 42.2% 62.0% 34.8%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2000 25/32 5.5 3.1 53.5% 70.2% 49.8% 53.9% 46.1% 60.6% 37.6%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2001 39/43 5.3 2.8 49.1% 70.2% 50.2% 54.5% 39.6% 59.8% 35.9%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2002 24/27 4.4 2.7 54.2% 69.4% 46.9% 51.4% 34.3% 58.9% 33.9%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2003 19/19 3.1 3.1 59.8% 67.7% 49.7% 58.9% 51.6% 60.4% 41.7%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2004 22/22 4.0 3.2 56.1% 65.5% 46.4% 46.6% 41.8% 57.2% 34.2%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2005 3/3 3.7 1.0 59.2% 68.3% 35.1% 51.9% 21.3% 55.6% 36.9%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2006 2/2 7.0 4.5 56.5% 60.7% 37.1% 61.5% 55.6% 50.6% 43.2%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% —/—
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% —/—
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% —/—
Career 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% 256/297 4.4 3.0 55.2% 68.0% 48.6% 54.8% 41.5% 59.2% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Galo Blanco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1489 102.5 +1.68 -1.21 0.982 49.3% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 +0.01
18 1995 1520 110.8 +0.35 -0.38 0.875 46.8% +40 41.2% -1.12 2–1 (67%) +0.03
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 -0.33 1996 1542 126.0 -1.80 -1.86 0.852 47.2% +52 42.0% -0.48 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) -0.19
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.04 1997 1594 126.7 -1.14 -2.43 0.848 47.4% -141 +84 44.3% -0.59 5–2 (71%) 11–6 (65%) +0.09
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) -0.81 1998 1624 134.1 -1.64 -0.67 0.921 48.4% -141 +70 47.2% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) -0.79
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) +0.85 1999 1622 132.6 -0.14 -2.04 0.917 48.9% -157 +95 44.7% -0.30 1–5 (17%) 8–4 (67%) -0.11
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) -1.62 2000 1572 121.3 -1.13 -0.80 0.955 49.0% -84 +49 38.7% -0.68 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) +0.81
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) +0.72 2001 1632 136.9 -1.42 -1.79 0.893 48.0% -176 +135 45.0% -0.46 6–4 (60%) 13–9 (59%) -1.90
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) +0.25 2002 1573 120.3 -1.73 -2.20 0.825 46.8% -154 +100 32.1% -1.04 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) -0.61
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) +2.30 2003 1626 127.4 -1.42 +1.17 1.055 51.2% +70 61.4% +0.75 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) +1.19
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) +0.21 2004 1556 114.8 -3.59 -3.00 0.797 45.9% -122 +75 30.2% -1.34 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) +0.09
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) -2.72 2005 1499 100.6 -2.64 -3.20 0.831 45.6% +58 0.0% -2.17 0–1 +0.04
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) +0.11 2006 1511 108.9 -1.85 -4.97 0.875 47.3% 50.0% -0.84 1–1 2–1 (67%) -0.08
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) +0.77
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) -2.94
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) +0.06
Career 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 1752 133.6 -1.47 -1.57 0.892 48.0% -140 +81 42.7% -0.54 36–44 (45%) 62–51 (55%) 104.3 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.