H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Henman vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 3-1
Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2006 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2006* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-1 6-3 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2001* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2000* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-4 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |