H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Grant Stafford H2H: 3-0

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Grant Stafford in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1998 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Grant Stafford
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-0 Grant Stafford #115 Match data Jul 30, 1998* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #20 6-4 6-2 Grant Stafford #74 Match data Mar 18, 1998* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #20 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) Grant Stafford #72 Match data Jun 21, 1997* QF Eastbourne Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Grant Stafford #1,161 #53 750 1,807 83 111 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Grant Stafford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1991 5–6 45.5% #172 1,552 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #191 1,635 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 17–14 54.8% #86 1,717 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 11–21 34.4% #168 1,558 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1995 2–7 22.2% #288 1,530 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1996 10–13 43.5% #83 1,563 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1997 21–20 51.2% #74 1,657 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1998 12–21 36.4% #163 1,564 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1999 0–3 0.0% #475 1,535 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2000 1–1 50.0% #435 1,592 0 0
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Grant Stafford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1993 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1997 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 8 12 20 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 53 70 123 43.1% 7 14 21 33.3% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 8 11 27.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 168/193 of Grant Stafford's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Grant Stafford
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1991 10/11 1.6 2.9 66.6% 61.7% 43.9% 53.1% 40.6% 55.5% 39.0%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1992 8/8 3.6 5.8 60.4% 64.4% 34.5% 42.1% 40.5% 53.0% 42.7%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1993 25/31 2.3 3.2 61.9% 66.5% 46.6% 53.3% 50.5% 59.1% 44.0%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1994 26/32 2.3 4.2 60.8% 64.3% 43.2% 48.3% 39.9% 56.0% 39.8%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1995 7/9 3.7 4.7 61.7% 64.6% 44.0% 53.7% 40.4% 56.3% 39.2%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1996 22/23 4.9 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 49.0% 61.2% 37.6% 61.8% 38.5%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1997 36/41 4.8 3.5 55.4% 71.7% 51.0% 53.0% 53.2% 62.4% 41.1%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1998 30/33 3.9 4.3 56.9% 67.1% 44.0% 49.0% 33.6% 57.0% 38.4%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1999 2/3 1.5 6.5 61.6% 70.0% 34.4% 45.2% 13.3% 56.4% 35.6%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2000 2/2 8.0 7.5 61.9% 79.4% 48.2% 59.2% 34.2% 68.1% 39.9%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 168/194 3.6 3.8 59.4% 67.6% 45.9% 52.2% 42.6% 58.8% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Grant Stafford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1990 1493 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.11
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1991 1553 120.2 -2.74 +0.10 0.877 47.4% +35 — — 37.9% -0.86 4–0 (100%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1992 1636 116.0 -2.73 +2.89 0.909 47.9% -35 — +9 52.4% -0.43 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.68
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1993 1718 129.9 -1.48 +4.18 1.076 51.6% -17 — -65 55.2% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.11
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1994 1558 130.9 -3.88 +1.31 0.904 47.9% +81 -50 +43 40.5% -0.46 3–10 (23%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.87
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1995 1530 116.1 -1.20 +0.97 0.895 47.6% +80 — — 32.0% -0.92 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.12
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1996 1563 122.3 -0.43 -0.01 1.008 50.1% +9 — +95 48.3% +0.05 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.72
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1997 1658 134.1 +0.10 +3.52 1.093 51.4% -32 -111 +67 50.0% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.14
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1998 1565 127.0 -3.40 +0.46 0.893 47.5% +59 -78 +128 39.2% -0.82 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.07
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1999 1535 103.1 +1.15 -0.33 0.817 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — — — -0.39
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2000 1592 112.5 +0.96 +1.20 1.250 53.0% — — — 62.5% +0.63 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1808 133.9 -1.78 +1.85 0.977 49.4% +21 -80 +52 44.8% -0.34 26–38 (41%) 27–27 (50%) 100.0 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.