H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 4-1

Tim Henman holds a 4–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1999 Los Angeles third round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 1999* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillaume Raoux #73 6-4 7-6(4) Tim Henman #5 Match data
Aug 1, 1998* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #12 7-5 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #56 Match data
Jan 9, 1998* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #17 7-5 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #47 Match data
Oct 16, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tim Henman #19 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Guillaume Raoux #48 Match data
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #14 6-3 6-3 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 — — — — — — —