H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 2-3

Guillermo Coria holds a 3–2 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 ATP Finals round robin 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Guillermo Coria
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #7 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Coria #6 Match data Nov 15, 2004 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Guillermo Coria #3 3-6 6-4 6-0 7-5 Tim Henman #9 Match data Jun 6, 2004* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Guillermo Coria #5 6-3 4-6 6-4 Tim Henman #32 Match data Aug 13, 2003* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Guillermo Coria #16 6-2 6-1 Tim Henman #28 Match data May 7, 2003* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #5 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 Guillermo Coria #97 Match data Apr 17, 2002* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Guillermo Coria #1,121 #3 3,770 2,124 211 113 65.1% 0 2 0 2 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Guillermo Coria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #88 1,547 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 2001 26–15 63.4% #44 1,696 0 1
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 2002 22–16 57.9% #45 1,760 0 1
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 2003 61–17 78.2% #5 2,020 0 6
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2004 37–15 71.2% #7 1,929 0 8
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2005 49–24 67.1% #8 1,865 0 9
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2006 11–14 44.0% #116 1,672 0 9
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2008 2–8 20.0% #577 1,575 0 9
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Guillermo Coria
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 2003 17 10 27 63.0% 38 5 43 88.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2004 10 10 20 50.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2005 19 11 30 63.3% 25 6 31 80.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2008 — — — — 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 66 46 112 58.9% 129 53 182 70.9% 9 7 16 56.2% 7 7 14 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 304/324 of Guillermo Coria's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Guillermo Coria
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 7/7 3.4 2.9 55.3% 66.5% 52.2% 50.8% 32.5% 60.3% 40.0%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 2001 37/41 3.6 2.6 51.6% 70.8% 53.5% 59.6% 46.9% 62.5% 42.9%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 2002 27/38 3.7 1.8 64.6% 68.3% 52.6% 53.7% 47.4% 62.4% 43.4%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 2003 75/78 2.8 1.7 66.6% 70.9% 58.0% 62.2% 50.2% 66.6% 45.6%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 2004 50/52 2.5 2.7 66.8% 70.1% 52.6% 55.2% 51.2% 64.2% 42.3%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2005 73/73 3.5 4.6 63.3% 70.0% 49.2% 59.7% 45.9% 62.3% 44.4%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2006 25/25 0.6 11.5 60.5% 62.2% 34.2% 44.6% 43.6% 50.5% 44.2%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2008 10/10 0.8 10.0 62.6% 58.6% 38.7% 47.9% 57.3% 51.1% 43.7%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 304/324 2.9 3.8 63.0% 69.1% 51.3% 57.2% 48.0% 62.3% 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Guillermo Coria
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1548 115.2 -0.35 +0.57 1.007 49.4% — +36 — 47.4% -0.42 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2001 1696 140.4 +0.37 +3.46 1.143 52.8% -138 +89 — 57.1% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.46
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 2002 1761 142.1 +0.49 +4.90 1.156 52.2% -66 +21 — 61.4% +0.62 4–7 (36%) 11–4 (73%) — -0.38
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 2003 2020 163.9 +4.25 +7.30 1.366 55.6% -113 +104 — 74.7% +1.96 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) — 0.00
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 2004 1930 154.6 +1.76 +5.87 1.183 53.0% -79 +246 -343 66.1% +1.10 13–2 (87%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.41
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 2005 1866 156.8 +0.57 +6.68 1.178 53.1% -64 +268 -159 61.5% +1.01 15–7 (68%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.14
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 2006 1673 120.2 -7.40 +4.26 0.893 47.4% +68 +198 — 47.5% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.68
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2008 1576 110.7 -5.84 +1.96 0.893 47.5% — +109 — 39.1% -0.83 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.21
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 2124 155.1 +0.75 +5.65 1.167 52.9% -77 +149 -264 62.7% +0.98 64–35 (65%) 52–40 (57%) 107.8 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.