H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Guy Forget H2H: 1-0
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1996 Lyon third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1996* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-2 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Guy Forget | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 |