H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Henman vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 4-0
Tim Henman holds a 4–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Tokyo semifinal 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 7-6(5) | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2002* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Tim Henman | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Nov 25, 2000* | Brighton | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-1 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tim Henman | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |