H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 4-3

Tim Henman holds a 4–3 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Washington fourth round 6-1 6-3.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2006* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #64 6-1 6-3 Jan-Michael Gambill #503 Match data
May 14, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #27 7-5 6-4 Jan-Michael Gambill #40 Match data
Mar 12, 2003* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #13 7-5 6-2 Jan-Michael Gambill #35 Match data
Aug 12, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tim Henman #8 4-6 6-2 6-2 Jan-Michael Gambill #22 Match data
Nov 12, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jan-Michael Gambill #71 7-5 6-3 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Oct 31, 1998* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jan-Michael Gambill #50 7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(5) Tim Henman #9 Match data
Apr 18, 1998* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Jan-Michael Gambill #81 6-3 4-6 6-3 Tim Henman #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,956 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Jan-Michael Gambill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–1 0.0% #555 1,487 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,764 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,764 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,804 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,745 0 2
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,755 0 2
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,642 0 3
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,557 0 3
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,567 0 3
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,503 0 3
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11