H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 1-0
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1998 Basel third round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1998* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Jason Stoltenberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |