H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1

Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2001 Adelaide fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H

3 – 1

4 main draw meetings

Jeff Tarango

USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Jan 5, 2001*	Adelaide	ATP 250	R16	Hard	Tim Henman #10	6-1 6-4	Jeff Tarango #112	Match data
Jan 9, 1999*	Doha	ATP 250	QF	Hard	Tim Henman #7	6-4 6-7(13) 6-4	Jeff Tarango #73	Match data
Jul 31, 1998*	Los Angeles	ATP 250	R16	Hard	Tim Henman #12	7-6(6) 7-5	Jeff Tarango #51	Match data
Apr 17, 1996*	Tokyo	ATP 250	R64	Hard	Jeff Tarango #83	6-1 6-4	Tim Henman #59	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Tim Henman	#615	#4	2,826	2,027	468	260	64.3%	0	1	0	0	10	11
Jeff Tarango	#1,001	#42	877	1,787	239	293	44.9%	0	0	0	0	2	2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tim Henman							Jeff Tarango
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	1–2	33.3%	#377	1,507	0	0
19	1994	3–5	37.5%	#167	1,513	0	0	1988	7–6	53.8%	#96	1,598	0	0
20	1995	7–7	50.0%	#95	1,584	0	0	1989	10–11	47.6%	#137	1,647	0	0
21	1996	37–24	60.7%	#29	1,821	0	0	1990	11–17	39.3%	#131	1,606	0	0
22	1997	47–23	67.1%	#17	1,895	0	2	1991	16–23	41.0%	#106	1,612	0	0
23	1998	55–29	65.5%	#7	1,960	0	4	1992	28–24	53.8%	#45	1,694	0	2
24	1999	41–25	62.1%	#12	1,785	0	4	1993	24–26	48.0%	#91	1,670	0	2
25	2000	55–23	70.5%	#10	1,953	0	6	1994	23–27	46.0%	#78	1,654	0	2
26	2001	49–20	71.0%	#9	1,924	0	8	1995	18–24	42.9%	#76	1,661	0	2
27	2002	45–18	71.4%	#8	1,867	0	9	1996	14–18	43.8%	#106	1,620	0	2
28	2003	30–16	65.2%	#15	1,970	0	11	1997	31–29	51.7%	#49	1,692	0	2
29	2004	41–20	67.2%	#6	1,926	0	11	1998	24–29	45.3%	#73	1,660	0	2
30	2005	23–18	56.1%	#36	1,746	0	11	1999	21–24	46.7%	#55	1,685	0	2
31	2006	31–20	60.8%	#39	1,868	0	11	2000	10–24	29.4%	#112	1,515	0	2
32	2007	4–12	25.0%	#292	1,684	0	11	2001	1–8	11.1%	#323	1,452	0	2
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2002	0–1	0.0%	#730	1,446	0	2