H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 0-1

Jeremy Bates holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Bates leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Bates won the 1995 Queen's Club Championships round of 32 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Bates #90 6-4 7-6(4) Tim Henman #231 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.57
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.61
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.50
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.18
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.28
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.79
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.