H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Henman vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-2
Jim Courier holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Canada Masters third round 6-1 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1999* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tim Henman | 4-6 7-5 7-5 6-7(5) 9-7 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1997* | Doha | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jim Courier | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |