H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 3-1

Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Hamburg Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Lars Burgsmuller
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #9 6-3 6-4 Lars Burgsmuller #91 Match data
May 28, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tim Henman #9 6-0 6-3 6-3 Lars Burgsmuller #91 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #6 6-1 1-6 6-3 Lars Burgsmuller #81 Match data
May 16, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Lars Burgsmuller #96 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Lars Burgsmuller #1,129 #65 596 1,747 87 149 36.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Lars Burgsmuller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% #203 1,475 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #162 1,482 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1996 6–6 50.0% #145 1,538 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1997 3–3 50.0% #165 1,544 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1998 7–12 36.8% #134 1,563 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1999 7–8 46.7% #134 1,593 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2000 2–5 28.6% #178 1,608 0 0
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2001 14–19 42.4% #83 1,599 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2002 14–21 40.0% #76 1,564 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2003 15–22 40.5% #76 1,615 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2004 8–19 29.6% #100 1,533 0 1
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2005 6–21 22.2% #141 1,462 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2006 4–7 36.4% #177 1,495 0 1
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2007 0–1 0.0% #426 1,426 0 1
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 — — — — — — —