H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-2

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Vienna Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-1 Marc Rosset #34 Match data Oct 12, 2000* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-2 Marc Rosset #45 Match data Apr 19, 2000* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Marc Rosset #31 7-6(5) 6-3 7-5 Tim Henman #7 Match data Jan 24, 1999* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #20 7-6(2) 6-4 Marc Rosset #28 Match data Sep 14, 1997* F Tashkent World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #23 6-2 7-5 6-4 Tim Henman #19 Match data Feb 23, 1997* F Antwerp Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 0 1 0 1 9 11
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Marc Rosset
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 592/673 of Marc Rosset's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Marc Rosset
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 592/741 9.6 5.3 56.5% 78.2% 48.0% 59.9% 39.6% 65.1% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Marc Rosset
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) — +0.66
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.07
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.83
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.51
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) — -0.29
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.03
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.64
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) — +1.44
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.59
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.75
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.28
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.48
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.72
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.43
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.