H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-2
Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Vienna third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2000* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-1 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-2 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 7-6(5) 6-3 7-5 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1997* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1997* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Marc Rosset | 6-2 7-5 6-4 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |