H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Mariano Zabaleta H2H: 4-5

Mariano Zabaleta holds a 5–4 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Mariano Zabaleta leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 2005 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 4-6 6-2.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mariano Zabaleta #51 6-4 4-6 6-2 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Jul 28, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #5 6-4 6-1 Mariano Zabaleta #39 Match data
May 8, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Mariano Zabaleta #40 3-6 6-3 6-2 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #9 6-2 6-1 Mariano Zabaleta #110 Match data
Oct 6, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-2 6-4 Mariano Zabaleta #53 Match data
May 20, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Mariano Zabaleta #38 7-5 6-3 Tim Henman #12 Match data
Mar 23, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-3 Mariano Zabaleta #25 Match data
Feb 24, 2000* London ATP 250 R32 Hard Mariano Zabaleta #32 7-6(3) 7-5 Tim Henman #11 Match data
May 9, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Mariano Zabaleta #48 3-6 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Mariano Zabaleta #1,009 #21 1,426 1,878 199 206 49.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Mariano Zabaleta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 2–2 50.0% #381 1,514 0 0
18 1996 9–8 52.9% #103 1,598 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1997 0–6 0.0% #257 1,531 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1998 14–8 63.6% #63 1,692 0 1
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1999 28–29 49.1% #28 1,686 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2000 17–26 39.5% #61 1,635 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2001 18–18 50.0% #59 1,723 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2002 20–28 41.7% #53 1,629 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2003 33–24 57.9% #27 1,763 0 2
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2004 25–20 55.6% #54 1,708 0 3
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2005 20–16 55.6% #83 1,726 0 3
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2006 4–8 33.3% #243 1,596 0 3
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2007 9–11 45.0% #104 1,602 0 3
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2008 0–2 0.0% #1141 1,556 0 3
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11