H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Mark Knowles H2H: 0-1

Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 Indianapolis round of 64 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mark Knowles
BAH Age 54 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Knowles #126 6-2 2-6 6-4 Tim Henman #35 Match data Aug 14, 1996* R64 Indianapolis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Mark Knowles #1,400 #96 484 1,623 23 52 30.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Mark Knowles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #728 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #430 1,449 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1991 2–3 40.0% #291 1,460 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #258 1,484 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1993 3–3 50.0% #173 1,525 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1994 2–7 22.2% #231 1,509 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1995 3–4 42.9% #139 1,549 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1996 10–17 37.0% #117 1,535 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1997 0–5 0.0% #363 1,493 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1998 2–3 40.0% #273 1,483 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1999 0–3 0.0% #223 1,451 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2000 0–2 0.0% #350 1,436 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Mark Knowles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1991 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1996 2 9 11 18.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 1 5 80.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 8 31 39 20.5% 2 8 10 20.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 65/71 of Mark Knowles's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Mark Knowles
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 1991 5/5 2.4 1.6 62.5% 68.6% 47.8% 56.2% 55.0% 60.2% 39.4%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1992 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.4% 78.2% 49.7% 83.3% 55.0% 64.9% 38.8%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1993 6/6 3.8 3.3 51.6% 75.1% 49.1% 56.8% 65.1% 62.4% 38.3%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1994 8/9 2.6 6.9 59.6% 65.0% 41.6% 46.5% 48.0% 55.5% 39.0%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1995 6/7 1.8 5.3 60.7% 63.3% 46.7% 46.2% 51.1% 56.4% 32.9%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1996 25/27 5.6 5.7 53.7% 71.0% 48.5% 58.3% 38.5% 60.4% 37.9%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1997 5/5 3.0 4.0 54.9% 54.9% 45.0% 51.2% 43.5% 50.0% 40.2%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1998 4/5 2.8 5.5 61.8% 67.3% 34.9% 59.2% 66.1% 54.8% 39.8%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1999 2/3 4.5 4.0 64.3% 58.9% 46.9% 38.9% 21.4% 54.0% 34.7%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2000 2/2 1.5 5.5 56.9% 57.1% 51.5% 35.4% 25.9% 54.5% 35.5%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 65/75 3.9 5.1 56.5% 67.7% 46.5% 54.4% 46.2% 58.2% 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Mark Knowles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1484 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1449 88.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.67 — — — +0.23
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1991 1461 102.6 +0.62 -2.64 0.990 49.0% +33 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.38
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1992 1484 109.1 -0.44 +1.34 1.106 52.0% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — 0–1 — +0.08
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1993 1526 114.5 +0.34 +0.85 1.017 50.3% +6 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.13
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1994 1509 115.5 -3.12 +0.60 0.877 47.3% -8 — — 40.7% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.25
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1995 1550 118.7 -1.39 -0.67 0.755 45.0% -34 — — 38.1% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.33
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1996 1535 112.8 -1.69 -0.03 0.957 49.0% -18 -15 +77 42.5% -0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–9 (36%) — +2.14
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1997 1493 119.1 -2.58 +0.64 0.804 45.6% -15 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–2 0–2 — -0.32
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1998 1484 96.7 -2.46 -1.13 0.881 48.0% — — +134 20.0% -2.20 1–0 — — +0.87
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1999 1451 98.8 -0.82 -1.79 0.754 44.4% +7 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.26
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2000 1437 100.7 -2.24 -1.34 0.780 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.06
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2001 1421 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2003 1410 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1623 115.1 -1.54 -0.20 0.906 48.1% -6 -15 +98 36.7% -0.88 8–17 (32%) 9–15 (38%) 94.9 +4.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.