H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Michael Llodra H2H: 3-0

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Rotterdam fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 2005* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #7 6-4 6-1 Michael Llodra #52 Match data
Jun 2, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Tim Henman #9 6-7(2) 4-6 6-4 6-3 9-7 Michael Llodra #94 Match data
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tim Henman #29 6-4 6-4 6-3 Michael Llodra #136 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,901 182 215 45.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,598 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,602 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,620 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,734 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,640 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2008 21–19 52.5% #40 1,725 0 3
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,738 0 3
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,879 0 5
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,842 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,787 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,688 0 5