H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2007 Italian Open first round 7-5 6-1.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #40 7-5 6-1 Tim Henman #50 Match data May 9, 2007* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Almagro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2004 2 7 9 22.2%
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Almagro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% 33.3% 72.7% 56.3%
18 —/— 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4%
Career 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Almagro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.01
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% +48 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) -0.67
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 -0.33 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) +0.44
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.04 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) -2.25
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) -0.81 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) +1.58
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) +0.85 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) +1.82
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) -1.62 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) +0.28
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) +0.72 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) +0.21
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) +0.25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) +2.38
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) +2.30 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) +1.39
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) +0.21 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) +3.89
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) -2.72 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% +77 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) -0.08
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) +0.11 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) -3.74
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) +0.77 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) +0.05
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) -2.94 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) -1.98
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) +0.06 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 +0.20
Career 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.