H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 4-6

Nicolas Escude holds a 6–4 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 5–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2003 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 6
10 main draw meetings
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Escude #67 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #20 Match data
Nov 2, 2002* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Nicolas Escude #41 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Oct 25, 2002* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #6 1-6 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Escude #43 Match data
May 15, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #6 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Escude #27 Match data
Mar 14, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-2 7-6(4) Nicolas Escude #23 Match data
Feb 24, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 F Hard Nicolas Escude #22 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Feb 23, 2001* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Escude #60 6-3 7-5 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Jan 8, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Escude #37 6-3 6-1 Tim Henman #12 Match data
Oct 1, 1999* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Escude #80 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Sep 19, 1998* Tashkent ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #11 3-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Escude #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Nicolas Escude #1,071 #17 1,357 1,909 157 124 55.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Escude
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 0–1 0.0% #670 1,497 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% #189 1,503 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1997 6–6 50.0% #93 1,620 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1998 22–22 50.0% #37 1,699 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1999 19–15 55.9% #37 1,820 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2000 26–22 54.2% #48 1,717 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2001 28–23 54.9% #27 1,724 0 2
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2002 29–15 65.9% #34 1,842 0 3
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2003 11–10 52.4% #114 1,790 0 3
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2004 15–8 65.2% #64 1,829 0 4
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11