H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 6-2

Tim Henman holds a 6–2 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 6–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Rotterdam third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2005* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #7 7-5 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #24 Match data
Sep 8, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tim Henman #6 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 6-7(4) 3-0 (ret.) Nicolas Kiefer #20 Match data
Feb 21, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #42 Match data
Aug 11, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #8 7-5 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #26 Match data
Oct 7, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #13 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Aug 14, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #5 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #17 Match data
Oct 10, 1998* Basel ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #28 Match data
Sep 26, 1997* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #71 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Tim Henman #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6