H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 4-1

Tim Henman holds a 4–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Munich Open round of 32 7-5 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #31 7-5 4-6 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #42 Match data May 1, 2003* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tim Henman #9 7-6(4) 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #30 Match data Oct 20, 2001* R16 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Lapentti #27 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data Mar 17, 2001* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #10 6-1 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Nicolas Lapentti #24 Match data Jan 19, 2001* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #8 Match data Mar 11, 2000* QF Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Lapentti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Lapentti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Lapentti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.