H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 4-1

Tim Henman holds a 4–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Munich third round 7-5 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 1, 2003* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Tim Henman #31 7-5 4-6 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #42 Match data
Oct 20, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #9 7-6(4) 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #30 Match data
Mar 17, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #27 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-1 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Nicolas Lapentti #24 Match data
Mar 11, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5