H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 2-3

Patrick Rafter holds a 3–2 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Patrick Rafter
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Patrick Rafter #15 6-2 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Aug 9, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Patrick Rafter #5 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #12 Match data
Jul 1, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Tim Henman #18 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 Patrick Rafter #6 Match data
Jan 17, 1998* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #19 7-6(5) 7-5 Patrick Rafter #2 Match data
Nov 8, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Patrick Rafter #3 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 — — — — — — —