H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 5-2

Tim Henman holds a 5–2 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Dubai fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 2006* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #49 7-5 2-6 7-6(3) Radek Stepanek #16 Match data
Oct 20, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #14 6-4 1-6 6-3 Tim Henman #26 Match data
Oct 14, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #15 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-1 Tim Henman #27 Match data
Mar 26, 2005* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #7 7-5 6-3 Radek Stepanek #25 Match data
May 6, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #7 6-1 6-1 Radek Stepanek #56 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #12 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-0 Radek Stepanek #45 Match data
Oct 31, 2002* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Tim Henman #9 6-1 7-5 Radek Stepanek #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5