H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 1-1

Tim Henman and Renzo Furlan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1997 Sydney Outdoor third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 9, 1997* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #24 6-4 6-4 Renzo Furlan #39 Match data
Oct 20, 1995* Beijing ATP 250 R16 Carpet Renzo Furlan #42 5-7 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #137 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,844 209 231 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1992 24–28 46.2% #53 1,667 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,681 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,682 0 2
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,727 0 2
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1996 29–26 52.7% #40 1,695 0 2
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,580 0 2
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,548 0 2