H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Robin Soderling H2H: 2-0

Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Wimbledon round of 128 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Robin Soderling
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #64 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 1-6 6-3 Robin Soderling #37 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tim Henman #29 6-3 6-1 6-4 Robin Soderling #152 Match data Jun 29, 2003* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,174 285 168 62.9% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,553 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 2004 31–27 53.4% #34 1,819 0 1
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,832 0 2
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2008 40–20 66.7% #17 1,948 0 3
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,097 0 4
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,121 0 6
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Robin Soderling
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2007 10 6 16 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2008 25 13 38 65.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 35 15 50 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2011 19 3 22 86.4% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 167 96 263 63.5% 71 49 120 59.2% 26 17 43 60.5% 21 6 27 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 448/453 of Robin Soderling's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Robin Soderling
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 2/2 9.5 2.5 52.3% 71.3% 58.2% 71.4% 35.7% 65.0% 36.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 6/6 4.8 4.3 58.0% 66.6% 41.7% 46.1% 39.1% 55.9% 35.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 16/16 8.3 3.6 63.7% 75.0% 52.8% 51.7% 47.9% 66.8% 37.6%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 2004 57/58 7.0 2.7 61.3% 73.0% 51.4% 58.5% 46.7% 64.6% 36.9%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 2005 34/34 9.2 3.9 60.0% 73.1% 48.6% 68.0% 44.5% 63.4% 36.0%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 2006 55/55 6.7 2.9 63.4% 75.9% 53.4% 67.2% 42.2% 67.7% 38.7%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 2007 37/37 7.4 2.6 62.3% 74.9% 51.0% 56.6% 46.1% 65.9% 40.1%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2008 59/60 10.5 2.8 61.8% 79.9% 55.0% 70.2% 44.2% 70.4% 37.9%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2009 64/67 8.9 2.8 59.7% 78.3% 56.0% 64.4% 46.8% 69.2% 39.0%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2010 75/75 9.9 3.3 59.2% 78.3% 52.6% 66.0% 45.1% 67.7% 39.4%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2011 43/43 8.0 2.7 62.9% 76.0% 54.4% 56.9% 46.3% 67.9% 40.3%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 448/453 8.5 3.0 61.2% 76.3% 53.0% 63.3% 45.2% 67.2% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Robin Soderling
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1519 112.1 +0.27 +0.13 1.047 50.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1554 115.3 -3.43 -0.70 0.809 46.1% +62 -67 — 31.3% -1.25 0–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1729 131.0 +1.72 +1.37 1.132 52.0% -13 — -32 57.1% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.25
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2004 1820 148.4 +1.68 +0.70 1.041 50.8% +14 -282 -138 53.4% +0.31 9–12 (43%) 16–13 (55%) — -3.53
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 2005 1738 135.0 +0.73 -0.84 0.986 49.9% +56 -187 -96 49.4% +0.06 5–4 (56%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.02
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 2006 1823 152.2 +4.87 +2.04 1.200 52.9% 0 -152 -111 59.2% +0.64 8–10 (44%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.90
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 2007 1832 149.5 +2.84 +2.66 1.176 52.9% +14 -116 -76 60.2% +0.80 8–8 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.51
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 2008 1948 162.9 +6.87 +1.96 1.279 53.7% +29 -144 -139 62.9% +1.10 11–6 (65%) 8–17 (32%) — -3.43
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 2009 2098 167.1 +5.93 +3.27 1.268 53.8% -49 -40 -206 63.7% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.00
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 2010 2122 171.5 +4.91 +4.01 1.222 53.4% -9 +7 -147 65.3% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.54
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2011 2128 166.5 +4.27 +3.85 1.257 53.8% +23 +78 -111 71.2% +1.27 8–1 (89%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.37
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 2175 163.7 +4.10 +2.30 1.175 52.7% +5 -76 -120 60.7% +0.79 72–60 (55%) 96–105 (48%) 99.2 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.