H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Sandon Stolle H2H: 1-0

Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Sandon Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1999 Australian Open round of 64 4-6 7-5 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sandon Stolle
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #7 4-6 7-5 4-6 6-1 6-4 Sandon Stolle #240 Match data Jan 22, 1999* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Sandon Stolle #1,379 #50 810 1,745 100 120 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Sandon Stolle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #813 1,485 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1990 2–3 40.0% #228 1,513 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1991 5–7 41.7% #156 1,541 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1992 19–20 48.7% #71 1,606 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 8–19 29.6% #182 1,577 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 4–6 40.0% #212 1,608 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1995 7–9 43.8% #179 1,614 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1996 24–20 54.5% #58 1,684 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1997 22–19 53.7% #83 1,729 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1998 6–12 33.3% #238 1,622 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1999 3–4 42.9% #375 1,618 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Sandon Stolle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1992 13 15 28 46.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1993 6 13 19 31.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 58 78 136 42.6% 10 15 25 40.0% 27 21 48 56.2% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 175/214 of Sandon Stolle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Sandon Stolle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1991 9/12 7.7 9.8 55.4% 70.7% 45.6% 64.3% 47.6% 59.5% 35.9%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1992 32/39 5.9 5.5 55.4% 72.2% 46.8% 50.8% 46.6% 61.1% 35.1%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1993 22/27 6.0 6.7 52.4% 72.6% 42.1% 52.9% 49.8% 58.1% 33.5%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1994 8/10 6.4 4.9 62.3% 70.2% 40.8% 58.6% 35.6% 59.1% 38.0%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1995 14/16 7.0 6.0 60.8% 70.2% 46.3% 46.2% 33.4% 60.8% 35.8%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1996 35/44 6.1 4.6 58.2% 73.8% 44.3% 52.9% 37.6% 61.5% 37.8%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1997 36/41 7.7 4.8 57.4% 75.0% 46.8% 55.8% 35.7% 63.2% 37.0%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1998 14/18 6.0 2.9 60.9% 72.4% 46.4% 52.1% 33.9% 62.2% 38.5%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1999 5/7 8.6 5.0 59.9% 74.7% 44.4% 58.8% 31.6% 63.3% 33.1%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 175/220 6.6 5.3 57.3% 72.9% 45.2% 53.5% 40.0% 61.2% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Sandon Stolle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1485 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1990 1513 114.1 — — — — +39 — — 50.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.30
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1991 1541 114.1 -1.27 -0.64 0.887 48.1% +5 — — 41.7% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.54
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1992 1607 127.6 -0.48 -1.69 0.902 48.3% -23 — +85 48.4% +0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.62
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1993 1578 122.0 -2.38 -2.07 0.801 46.1% 0 -77 +98 36.6% -1.01 4–6 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.20
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1994 1608 125.5 -1.19 +0.52 0.927 48.7% -2 — — 38.5% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.16
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1995 1614 122.4 -0.39 -0.62 0.913 48.7% -10 — +48 46.5% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.32
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1996 1684 131.4 -0.42 -0.13 0.979 49.5% -48 -190 +102 50.9% +0.18 8–4 (67%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.89
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1997 1729 128.4 +1.11 -0.21 1.004 50.1% -49 -172 +73 54.8% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.02
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1998 1622 124.1 -0.05 -0.07 1.018 50.6% +27 — — 43.2% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.60
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1999 1619 118.5 -0.31 -1.92 0.903 48.6% +28 — — 52.2% 0.00 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.31
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1746 132.7 -0.41 -0.76 0.934 48.9% -15 -164 +83 47.2% -0.18 35–40 (47%) 44–53 (45%) 99.1 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.