H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-1

Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on grass, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Doha quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2004* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #15 6-3 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #39 Match data
Jun 12, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #74 Match data
Jun 11, 1998* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Tim Henman #18 6-3 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #80 Match data
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sargis Sargsian #95 5-2 (ret.) Tim Henman #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1