H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-1

Tim Henman holds a 3–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on grass, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Qatar Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #15 6-3 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #39 Match data Jan 10, 2004* QF Qatar Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #74 Match data Jun 12, 1999* SF Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Tim Henman #18 6-3 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #80 Match data Jun 11, 1998* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Sargis Sargsian #95 5-2 (ret.) Tim Henman #18 Match data May 27, 1998* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.