H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Scott Draper H2H: 2-0

Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Scott Draper
AUS Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #5 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-3 Scott Draper #230 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tim Henman #13 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Scott Draper #46 Match data Sep 2, 1998* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Scott Draper #1,110 #42 957 1,818 107 126 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Scott Draper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1995 13–13 50.0% #87 1,645 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1996 18–24 42.9% #95 1,668 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1997 23–20 53.5% #58 1,721 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1998 23–17 57.5% #51 1,780 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1999 11–17 39.3% #154 1,625 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 2000 2–5 28.6% #258 1,588 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2001 2–5 28.6% #221 1,595 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2002 2–5 28.6% #137 1,608 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2003 13–16 44.8% #103 1,686 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2005 0–4 0.0% #718 1,635 0 1
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Scott Draper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 16 11 27 59.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1998 12 11 23 52.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 6 9 15 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 64 71 135 47.4% 14 24 38 36.8% 22 23 45 48.9% 7 8 15 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 197/233 of Scott Draper's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Scott Draper
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1995 20/26 8.3 3.3 55.3% 72.8% 49.9% 66.8% 46.7% 62.4% 30.9%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1996 32/42 5.7 2.5 53.4% 71.2% 53.3% 52.1% 40.9% 62.6% 35.5%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1997 38/43 6.8 3.1 55.5% 72.4% 49.6% 55.6% 43.0% 62.1% 36.9%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1998 35/40 6.3 2.8 55.2% 72.1% 51.1% 57.1% 49.0% 62.4% 35.4%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1999 22/28 5.4 3.1 57.6% 70.2% 50.8% 58.1% 41.7% 62.2% 33.5%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 2000 4/7 7.5 4.3 52.8% 73.2% 45.8% 52.5% 57.8% 60.3% 29.4%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2001 6/7 12.0 4.0 55.0% 74.3% 51.1% 61.3% 25.3% 63.9% 32.3%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2002 7/7 4.9 3.3 61.8% 70.7% 57.8% 51.1% 35.6% 65.5% 34.5%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2003 29/29 7.2 2.1 60.4% 73.0% 56.1% 61.2% 29.1% 66.1% 33.1%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2005 4/4 9.0 4.0 60.4% 68.5% 43.9% 52.7% 35.0% 59.3% 30.6%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 197/233 6.7 2.9 56.3% 72.0% 51.7% 57.4% 41.3% 63.0% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Scott Draper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1995 1646 127.4 +0.52 -4.44 0.822 48.0% -4 -14 -116 47.4% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.44
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1996 1668 137.5 +0.51 -0.73 0.950 49.1% -21 -28 -127 47.7% -0.05 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — -2.02
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1997 1721 137.1 +0.33 -0.08 0.975 49.5% +8 -51 -109 51.3% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.28
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1998 1780 130.1 +1.17 -1.22 0.942 49.1% -47 -150 -49 51.0% -0.22 11–5 (69%) 14–7 (67%) — -1.06
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1999 1625 132.1 -0.25 -1.66 0.885 47.9% +60 -47 +81 37.7% -0.64 5–2 (71%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.27
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2000 1589 108.5 -1.83 -0.72 0.740 46.1% +32 — +107 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.20
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2001 1596 118.4 +0.20 -0.50 0.893 48.3% +20 — — 38.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.01
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2002 1608 122.9 +1.18 +0.46 0.999 49.6% -20 — — 33.3% -0.57 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.59
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2003 1686 136.7 +2.23 -1.75 0.975 49.3% +6 — +45 43.7% -0.51 2–4 (33%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.06
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2005 1636 98.8 +0.70 -0.30 0.752 45.3% — — — 26.7% -2.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.79
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1818 137.9 +0.73 -1.26 0.927 48.8% -3 -51 -27 45.5% -0.36 39–37 (51%) 63–56 (53%) 105.9 -3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.