H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Shuzo Matsuoka H2H: 2-0

Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics first round 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Shuzo Matsuoka
JPN Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #37 7-6(4) 6-3 Shuzo Matsuoka #85 Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard
Tim Henman #60 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Shuzo Matsuoka #63 Match data Apr 27, 1996* QF Seoul World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Shuzo Matsuoka #1,299 #46 717 1,821 127 155 45.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Shuzo Matsuoka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #691 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 1–3 25.0% #370 1,488 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #260 1,484 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #82 1,636 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1989 8–11 42.1% #181 1,572 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1990 9–13 40.9% #144 1,582 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1991 23–19 54.8% #69 1,629 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1992 20–16 55.6% #64 1,724 0 1
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1993 15–15 50.0% #127 1,674 0 1
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1994 8–14 36.4% #124 1,627 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1995 16–17 48.5% #63 1,706 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1996 12–24 33.3% #148 1,576 0 1
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 1997 2–3 40.0% #534 1,580 0 1
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,561 0 1
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Shuzo Matsuoka
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1992 11 10 21 52.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1994 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1996 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 84 98 182 46.2% 7 17 24 29.2% 23 18 41 56.1% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 175/205 of Shuzo Matsuoka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Shuzo Matsuoka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1991 36/42 6.0 2.6 60.1% 72.1% 51.0% 65.1% 46.0% 63.8% 37.3%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1992 32/36 7.0 2.7 60.2% 74.9% 54.2% 59.1% 46.2% 66.7% 35.9%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1993 24/30 7.7 2.9 62.1% 74.2% 49.0% 67.1% 40.4% 65.0% 33.8%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1994 21/22 8.9 2.7 58.3% 74.9% 53.8% 57.6% 44.3% 66.2% 34.8%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1995 29/33 9.7 3.4 63.2% 76.2% 48.2% 62.9% 38.1% 66.1% 34.8%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1996 29/36 7.4 3.3 61.4% 71.3% 46.0% 53.1% 46.7% 61.5% 34.5%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 1997 3/5 10.3 1.7 59.3% 74.7% 57.9% 66.7% 6.7% 67.6% 31.0%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 1998 1/1 8.0 0.0 53.2% 69.7% 41.4% 50.0% 0.0% 56.5% 30.5%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 175/282 7.7 2.9 60.8% 73.8% 50.4% 61.0% 43.0% 64.8% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Shuzo Matsuoka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1484 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1488 115.9 — — — — +38 — — 25.0% -3.00 — — — -0.18
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1987 1485 110.8 — — — — +50 — — 30.0% -0.40 1–1 0–1 — -0.11
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.9 -0.04 1988 1637 136.4 — — — — +14 -128 — 47.1% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 -1.46
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) 102.6 -0.81 1989 1573 109.4 — — — — +34 — — 42.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 7–4 (64%) 101.0 +1.13
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) 105.8 +0.85 1990 1583 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 47.4% -0.35 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.54
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) 104.5 -1.62 1991 1629 133.0 +1.75 -1.11 1.030 50.8% +20 -126 -64 53.4% +0.34 8–7 (53%) 8–8 (50%) 100.8 +1.52
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) 95.6 +0.72 1992 1725 139.5 +4.24 -0.99 1.078 51.7% -24 -226 -44 53.2% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -1.88
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) 100.3 +0.25 1993 1674 124.0 +1.90 -2.99 0.965 49.7% +4 -120 -22 50.0% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 11–4 (73%) 106.5 +0.77
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 96.3 +2.30 1994 1627 134.9 +2.64 -1.49 1.029 50.3% -9 — +33 44.6% -0.13 1–8 (11%) 5–8 (38%) 91.0 -1.46
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 94.1 +0.21 1995 1706 136.1 +2.95 -1.36 1.027 50.5% -63 — +51 53.4% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 -1.75
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) 104.5 -2.72 1996 1576 127.9 -0.31 -1.95 0.894 48.5% +20 -69 +174 40.7% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 7–14 (33%) 92.8 -0.24
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) 95.8 +0.11 1997 1581 109.2 +0.61 -1.20 0.956 47.8% +16 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.07
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 91.8 +0.77 1998 1561 97.2 -1.03 -3.75 0.701 43.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -17 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) 95.7 -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) 84.9 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1822 137.1 +2.15 -1.59 1.001 50.2% +2 -126 +27 47.7% -0.17 39–58 (40%) 68–65 (51%) 99.6 -0.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.