H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 0-2

Stefan Edberg holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1996 Stuttgart Masters round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Edberg #17 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #25 Match data Oct 23, 1996* R64 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Stefan Edberg #28 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #39 Match data Sep 4, 1996* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,237 748 248 75.1% 6 4 1 9 21 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,825 0 1
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,130 1 5
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,124 1 8
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,208 2 15
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1988 58–16 78.4% #5 2,077 3 18
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,154 3 20
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,175 4 27
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,147 5 33
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1992 64–20 76.2% #2 2,035 6 36
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,873 6 40
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,827 6 41
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,887 6 41
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Stefan Edberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 9 5 14 64.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0%
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1985 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 16 7 23 69.6%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 32 5 37 86.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 10 26 61.5%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1987 42 5 47 89.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1988 28 9 37 75.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 12 4 16 75.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 29 7 36 80.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1990 39 5 44 88.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 39 7 46 84.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 18 3 21 85.7%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1992 32 6 38 84.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 9 25 64.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 24 9 33 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 11 7 18 61.1%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1994 31 9 40 77.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 26 11 37 70.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 18 12 30 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 380 104 484 78.5% 110 48 158 69.6% 98 26 124 79.0% 160 70 230 69.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 392/450 of Stefan Edberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Stefan Edberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1991 77/87 3.0 2.9 63.0% 75.5% 56.0% 60.7% 45.0% 68.3% 43.6%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1992 75/84 3.5 3.6 63.9% 74.6% 54.9% 64.0% 45.3% 67.4% 40.6%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 1993 63/80 2.9 4.6 60.3% 73.6% 51.0% 59.4% 47.5% 64.4% 42.1%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 1994 62/76 2.8 3.6 62.4% 72.9% 53.8% 61.0% 47.0% 65.7% 41.8%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 1995 52/54 3.0 3.6 61.0% 72.5% 49.2% 60.5% 46.4% 63.6% 41.6%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 1996 63/69 3.9 4.1 59.0% 72.3% 52.5% 58.8% 41.9% 64.0% 41.0%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 392/996 3.2 3.7 61.7% 73.7% 53.2% 60.9% 45.5% 65.8% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Stefan Edberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1464 96.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1617 133.1 — — — — +5 -20 -83 52.8% +0.21 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1826 153.7 — — — — -28 -162 -156 60.9% +0.75 5–7 (42%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.06
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1985 2130 166.9 — — — — -89 -335 -173 72.7% +1.45 7–8 (47%) 19–14 (58%) — -3.55
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 1986 2125 164.5 — — — — +27 -250 -162 69.7% +1.52 18–7 (72%) 19–13 (59%) — -1.90
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1987 2209 172.3 — — — — +77 -360 -99 77.7% +1.92 13–3 (81%) 19–16 (54%) — -3.18
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1988 2077 159.9 — — — — +31 -199 +95 72.3% +1.37 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -2.31
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1989 2155 169.3 — — — — +39 -186 +7 73.0% +1.25 10–5 (67%) 18–9 (67%) — -6.13
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1990 2176 173.1 — — — — +30 -272 +103 74.5% +1.68 16–1 (94%) 19–10 (66%) — -4.50
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1991 2148 168.6 +6.92 +5.37 1.372 55.2% +61 -218 +146 78.7% +1.85 12–7 (63%) 18–9 (67%) — -1.02
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1992 2036 166.3 +5.64 +3.53 1.246 53.7% +37 -92 +216 68.9% +1.22 17–10 (63%) 29–14 (67%) — +0.13
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 1993 1987 165.8 +3.09 +4.76 1.184 52.9% +16 +31 +233 67.6% +1.11 15–9 (63%) 24–13 (65%) — -2.70
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 1994 1874 159.8 +4.24 +3.69 1.218 53.6% +60 +64 +297 67.4% +1.26 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.11
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 1995 1827 152.9 +1.63 +3.73 1.143 52.1% +69 +91 +198 60.3% +0.83 12–7 (63%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.90
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 1996 1888 152.3 +2.04 +3.83 1.139 52.1% -26 +12 +184 60.6% +0.82 9–9 (50%) 13–17 (43%) — -2.82
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 2237 168.9 +4.15 +4.19 1.222 53.4% +27 -108 +46 69.9% +1.32 161–95 (63%) 235–156 (60%) 102.1 -2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.