H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 3-2
Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Stefan Koubek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2006 Zagreb semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Stefan Koubek | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| May 2, 2003* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Stefan Koubek | 6-4 6-0 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2001* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-1 | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 7-6(3) | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1999* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-1 6-3 | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Stefan Koubek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |